Building Beyond the Bachelor’s: Credentialing for the 21st Century

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The Value of Credentials in the 21st Century is Changing and Instutions Need to Adapt

By Amrit Ahluwalia | Managing Editor, The EvoLLLution: A Destiny Solutions Illumination

Welcome to an ongoing series by The EvoLLLution’s Managing Editor, Amrit Ahluwalia. His articles will recap content published on The EvoLLLution, providing postsecondary leaders with some wider visibility on what’s happening in the fast-changing world of higher education.

It’s not news that “the degree” is losing ground as the sole signal of labor market readiness.

While the degree used to serve as the exclusive and ultimate signal of employability (among other things), employers are increasingly skeptical of its value. A well-cited 2014 survey found that while 96% of provosts believe they were preparing students for success in the workforce only 11% of employers agreed.

Meanwhile, some of America’s largest companies and industries are looking past degrees to identify new hires:

  • Fewer than half of STEM jobs in New York City require a bachelor’s degree
  • According to IBM, 10-15% of the company’s new hires do not have four-year degrees
  • Among recent college graduates, 43% are underemployed in their first job out of college and more than half remain underemployed after a decade

And this is all in addition to the explosion in the number of middle-skill jobs, which require some postsecondary learning but no degree (as discussed by Burning Glass’s Matt Sigelman in this EvoLLLution interview).

This isn’t to say degrees themselves lack value. But employers are looking for more—a better sense of what a student has actually accomplished and a clearer sense of their skills—which means students are looking for new ways of sharing that information.

The biggest flaw with traditional degrees is that they hold meaning for the institution involved, but they’re relatively opaque to outsiders. Even the presumably simple task of credit transfer requires time and effort from staff at both institutions to determine the relative value of different courses. The transcript provides a list of course codes that are unintelligible, and students and employers both are forced to ascribe meaning and value to an array of letters and disciplines without much evidence to back it all up.

This is evidenced by a broader paradigm shift we’re seeing in higher ed, where students are behaving more like customers. This is a chart I use in a number of my presentations and I think it’s helpful here in framing the challenge postsecondary institutions are up against:

The Fundamental Shift in Higher Education
Institutions must adapt to fundamental shifts in higher education if they are to remain relevant to students and industry

Of course, overcoming this obstacle doesn’t require a wholesale shift in the way universities operate. It just requires them to find new and better ways to understand and communicate student outcomes.

This is where the expertise and experience of CE divisions can make a huge difference for the whole campus.

How Continuing Ed Can Help Universities Keep Credentials Relevant

CE divisions can help postsecondary institutions reimagine credentials (and keep them relevant!) in two key ways:

  1. Expanding the breadth of available microcredentials
  2. Improving comprehension of outcomes and skills

Expanding the Breadth of Available Microcredentials

Non-traditional divisions have a huge amount of experience leveraging non-credit credentials to help individuals get the relevant skills and paperwork they need to enter and advance through lucrative careers. This has historically been done on the periphery of the college, but with more openness from the main campus access to these critical microcredentials could be opened up to all learners within an institution.

This effort could start with embedding microcredentials into degree programs. According to an EvoLLLution article by New America’s Michael Prebil, who has been conducting research on this topic, “combining the gold-standard degree with the job-readiness signaled by certifications makes sense in a skills-conscious economy.”

This was echoed by Lumina Foundation’s Holly Zanville in an EvoLLLution article sharing 10 key takeaways from a survey of higher education leaders, employers and others on embedding industry credentials into degrees. According to Zanville, there are three key benefits to combining academic and industry credentials:

  1. Students can complete both academic credential and industry and professional-recognized certification;
  2. Colleges’ and universities’ curricula remain up-to-date with industry standards; and
  3. Employers get students trained to their specifications.

Another approach CE divisions are currently taking to ensure main campus students enter the workforce with relevant skills is post-baccalaureate credentialing. These “post-bac” certificates create opportunities for recent graduates to enroll in a non-credit program designed to help them build the technical skills base necessary to stand out in a ferocious and crowded labor market.

“When they enter the job market they’ll be more ready to demonstrate the skills they have to offer,” said Dennis Di Lorenzo, former Dean of the School of Professional Studies at NYU, in an interview with The EvoLLLution. “The marketplace is fairly competitive and the number of students going into these post-baccalaureate experiences is increasing.”

New call-to-action

Improving Comprehension of Outcomes and Skills

The second obstacle to overcome is in ensuring credentials clearly communicate their meaning and value. As I mentioned earlier: a transcript is about as clear as mud to the average employer, and while degrees once signaled broad competency their influence is waning as well. This is a disservice to the institution, the student and employers alike.

But non-traditional divisions have been working for years to issue credentials that clearly communicate what a graduate is able to do, and have been pioneering innovative credentialing models—like badging and digital credentials—that provide even more clarity.

That clarity makes a huge difference in creating value for the credential itself, as discussed by Jonathan Lehrich, Associate Dean of Executive Education at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business, in this EvoLLLution interview: “The digital badge is exactly equivalent to that paper certificate—and indeed, anybody who receives the one can also receive the other—but the difference between them is twofold,” he said. “First, the digital badge is more readily shareable. Second, it makes the underlying requirements that someone had to achieve in order to earn it more transparent.”

He goes on to explain that in the information embedded within a digital badge, institutions can include critical clues that contextualize the credential—program length, work involved, intended outcomes, etc—all of which help employers understand what a prospective hire brings to the table and helps students more clearly communicate their achievements.

“Badges clarify value,” Lehrich continued. “They don’t necessarily increase or decrease value. They just make it more readily communicable.”

The Future is Stackable

Where we go from here, I believe, is a postsecondary ecosystem that’s designed more closely around the needs of modern students and employers. This shift will be characterized by greater recognition of student learning and more relevant credentials being issued alongside degrees.

In his interview, Lehrich made a critical point about the state of traditional higher education today:

“I am very concerned about the number of people in this country who don’t finish degrees and are left with massive debt and no credentials. I’m not suggesting that we should water down the credential. Rather, I think that people should be able to get well-reasoned, completely transparent, readily verifiable credentials for each stage of their educational journey.”

This is a really important idea worthy of deep consideration. Students don’t magically transform into a “graduate” at the end of a four-year degree program, like a butterfly leaving a cocoon. Their skills and knowledge don’t exist as a 0/1 binary, where they suddenly become competent after walking across the stage. But today’s degree model operates as though this is the case.

With the tools now at their disposal, institutions should be modifying existing degree programs—and building new ones—that are stackable and have well-selected industry credentials embedded into them. This way, as a student progresses through a program at their own pace. “There is a chance for these kinds of alternative credentialing schemes to add value to existing degrees, rather than replace them,” wrote Rich DeMillo, Director of Georgia Tech’s C21CU, in The EvoLLLution.

“A degree was always thought to be currency (backed by respected and accredited academic brands) that could be traded for a job. The boom in credentials that are alternatives to actual degrees might be a sign that the higher ed marketplace has strayed from this tried-and-true model. Alternative credentialing might be the ‘something’ that employers and students are looking for.”

Non-traditional divisions can and should be leaned upon by main campus leaders to provide insights into the kinds of skills and credentials employers need, and then to provide support in building non-credit credentials into programming. This broadening of access—and expansion of credentialing—will benefit students, employers and the institution alike.

Beyond that, this transition will require a massive ego check from those who believe higher ed is perfect the way it is. Because it’s not.

Download this Primer to better understand the value digital badges can bring to the table for your institution: Attract and Retain Learners with Digital Badges.

Print Friendly
KNOWLEDGE ENGAGEMENT